4 methods · 12 questions
A claim of the form 'for all , P(n)' or 'if is prime then Q(n)' is refuted by a single case that satisfies the hypothesis yet breaks the conclusion. When the candidates are handed to you (I, II, III) or are small, do not prove anything: substitute and check. Watch the hypothesis first, a case that fails the hypothesis can never be a counterexample.
Trigger: 'for all', 'always', 'is a counterexample', or a list of explicit candidate values I/II/III.
Instances:
(i) plug each listed value into both sides of an identity and keep the one that disagrees;
(ii) for 'if prime then ...', test the small primes and discard any candidate whose number is not prime;
(iii) for a claim about a family, find the one value where the divisibility or primality pattern breaks.
Linked questions (4)